Main contents

Archive for October 2007

Foreclosure or Bankruptcy?

October 29th, 2007

You know it’s bad when MSNBC runs the following article : Which is worse: Foreclosure or Bankruptcy?

If you are facing this decision, you still may have options available to you.  Make sure to check them all out before you decide that it’s all or nothing, or that you are at the point of no return concerning your house. 

Here’s what MSNBC had to say….

Neither option is going to be easy. Generally, a foreclosure will remain on your credit report for 7 years, while a bankruptcy remains for 10 years. But that doesn’t mean foreclosure is necessarily the better option, according to Ray Hooper, Education and Housing Director for the Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Greater Dallas, a non-profit agency that tries to help people facing foreclosure keep their homes.

“A foreclosure is very serious to mortgage lenders,” said Hooper. “They’re going look at a foreclosure more seriously than they will a bankruptcy that doesn’t include the house.”

Before you accept that foreclosure is a foregone conclusion, consider trying to avoid it. If you’re having trouble making payments, or even behind by a month or two, contact your lender before the process goes any further. Even if you’ve gotten an official “notice of default,” saying you’re several months behind, you still have time before the formal foreclosure process begins.

The first question you need to decide is whether you want to keep your house or give it up. If you want to keep it, you need to try to work out a plan to get back on track. This involves either making up for the missed payments – which you can do all at once or try to spread out – or coming up with a new plan. One option is to have the loan modified – at a lower interest rate, for example. Or you can ask for “forbearance,” which basically means the lender suspends payments until you can get back on your feet. If you’re in over your head and bought too much house, though, these options probably aren’t going to help.

So you may have to consider moving. Even if you do lose your house, you don’t want a foreclosure on your record when you go looking for a smaller house or a place to rent. One option is to ask the lender to hold off on foreclosing until you sell. If you’re mortgage is bigger than your house is worth, your looking at what’s called a “short sale” and you’ll owe money to the lender even after the house is sold. In some cases, lenders will let you off the hook for that amount rather than go through the expense of foreclosing. (But you may not be completely off the hook: you may owe taxes on that amount.)

You can also try something called a “deed in lieu of foreclosure” – which basically means you turn over your house to the lender and walk away without owing anything. But you’ll need to work this out with the lender: you can’t just leave the keys in the mailbox.

While it’s possible to work out one of these solutions with your lender on your own, you may have better luck with the help of someone who specializes in the process. A good attorney who knows real estate law can help, but you may not be able to afford that. A credit counselor (from an accredited, non-profit agency, not the slime balls who spam you with bogus promises of making your debts “go away”) is another option. Lenders are more likely to go along if a competent third party is there to help smooth the process.

If all else fails, you may have to consider allowing foreclosure to proceed – or filing for bankruptcy. But like most aspect of personal finance, there’s no “one-size-fits-all” guidelines for which is the least bad alternative. There are different ways to file for bankruptcy, and not all of your debts have to be included (for more, see the next page.) So even if faced with bankruptcy, you’ll need advice from someone - either a good credit counselor or a bankruptcy attorney - who can walk you through the choices you’ll face.

- Stacie

Share/Save/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Denver’s Art Scene Soars - in USA Today

October 26th, 2007

A new angle on art: The Denver Art Museum's $110 million Frederic C. Hamilton Building, designed by Daniel Libeskind, has become a structural landmark for the city since opening last fall. There is a great write up in today’s USA Today that profiles the thriving art scene in Denver…

DENVER — Clark Richert recalls the cultural wasteland that was Denver in the 1960s when he arrived from Kansas City.

“I basically went into shock when I walked into the Denver Art Museum,” says the 66-year-old artist, sometimes called the godfather of Colorado contemporary art. “It really was almost non-existent when compared to the (art museum) in Kansas City.”

PHOTOS: Denver gets artsy

Lounging at the back of Denver’s well-known Rule Gallery, which is showing his work through early November, Richert says that for a while, there was only one gallery in Denver exhibiting contemporary art — a pretty pathetic showing for one of the biggest cities between Chicago and Los Angeles.

“When we wanted to see art, we’d go to Colorado Springs,” Richert says, chuckling.

FIND MORE STORIES IN: DENVER | Gallery | Denver Art Museum | Daniel Libeskind | John Hickenlooper | Michael Graves

How things have changed.

Not only is the gallery scene exploding — witness the crowd of gallery hoppers milling about Richert’s large-scale geometric paintings — but this weekend brings the opening of Denver’s much-awaited new Museum of Contemporary Art, a $15.5 million showplace for cutting-edge international works that already is drawing national attention. And it’s just the latest major cultural landmark to make its debut in the fast-growing city, which suddenly finds itself on the map for more than just its sports teams.

Watch out, Santa Fe. There’s a new art mecca taking shape in the Rockies.

Read the rest of the article here.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Did you get Rockies Tickets?

October 22nd, 2007

It was a question heard all over town this morning - and I asked everyone that I ran into - at the bank, the title company, the coffee shop…and not one person said yes, though many had logged on and tried to get tickets!

So whose decision was it to sell World Series tickets only online?  With a system that had obviously never been tested?  They are reporting now that 8.5 million people tried to buy tickets, and only 500 were sold.

Insane.

There are tons of frustrated fans standing outside Coors Field yelling at everyone they see who looks like they might have something to do with this mess, and of course they are totally yelling at the wrong people!

MLB is supposed to announce later this afternoon what they are going to do to try and get the tickets sold in the fairest way possible…so, stay tuned.

 And, GO ROCKIES!

- Stacie 

Share/Save/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »